Category Archives: Jane Austen

Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters – Jane Austen and Ben H. Winters

Given how much I enjoyed Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, I decided to give another Austen adaptation a try – Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters. I had high hopes, but my only expectation was that the main plot points remained the same, and on that front the novel did not disappoint.

Overall the novel was mostly consistent, and generally well written. There were a few times, I felt that some passages were a little long-winded and perhaps not as concise as they could have been. It was in those moments I felt the shift between the tone of Austen and that of Winters’, the subtle differences were all of a sudden much more obvious. In my opinion that was a shame, as I felt it disrupted my flow as a reader. I kept having to remember that the book is an adapted contribution from two different writers.

Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters

As you would expect from an adaptation, there were plenty of new plot twists and new character development moments to enjoy. Some I would arguably say are more exciting than others, some I would say might not matter if they had been included or not. But combined they certainly added a new layer to the original novel.

This added layer was most evident in the new character traits attributed to the Dashwood’s and the Steele’s. Elinor Dashwood in particular, became a much more exciting and likeable character, than was possible in the Austen’s original version. This was simply achieved by a slightly more up-tempo pace throughout, and of course the addition of new events into the plot.

It was good to see that although this was an adaptation, Winters’ had taken care not to leave any wide open plot holes, or major character misalignments. Sure if you’re specifically looking for them I’m sure you’d find them, as you would in any book, film or play. But for me, Winters’ took enough care and paid enough attention to detail, that by the end of novel I felt that all the interlocking stories had been satisfyingly concluded.

Whether you’re a fan of adaptations or a fan of Austen, this is definitely a novel I’d recommend other readers try. But, for a true comparison, it is always worth reading the original too – and I do mean READ, not watch a film or TV series adaptation!

Advertisements

12 Comments

Filed under Adventure, Fantasy, Fiction, Jane Austen

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies- Jane Austen and Seth Grahame-Smith

In my last post I claimed Wuthering Heights was no Austen, and so following that I chose to read an Austen novel- of sorts. Naturally I went for a well read classic but my choice was of a very modern revision of those well-loved characters such as Elizabeth Bennet and Mr Darcy.

Pride and Prejudice and zombies is as true to Austen’s original as a revision could possibly be. It is my opinion that this was Seth Grahame-Smith’s plan, and is well executed enough to retain all the core aspects which Austen wished to narrate. It is quirky enough to give a reader, who’s copy of the original is well thumbed, something a little different. Though in keeping with Austen’s style of prose, the fair few zombie related and violent escapades were not wholly gripping- and thus again did not detract from the original text.

I largely found myself reading forward to see which bits had been re-written, which were a little different and which were exactly the same. Admittedly I was disappointed by how little change there was, particularly in chapters involving the horribly pretentious Miss Bingley. The bits that were re-written were done well. Seth Grahame-Smith engaged well and at times thoroughly with the idea of Zombies across the land. Particularly interesting was his take on becoming a zombie and the pre-zombie life of someone who succumbs to the ‘strange plague’- this most engagingly done through Charlotte Lucas. These elements are often missing from various other works of horror, science fiction and fantasy.

The violent warrior mentality brought out in the dual personality of Elizabeth Bennet rather suited her. Though initially I felt her lust for ‘truth’ was mis-communicated as a lust for vengeance, this turns her character rather more violent,especially towards Mr Darcy, than was expected. This hidden nature is extremely prominent in this modern version of a classic tale, but is never alluded to (in my reading) in Austen’s version. Therefore the reader is treated to Grahame-Smith’s own instincts and capabilities with an adopted character. A novel of his own would certainly be interesting.

Having only access to my own copy, it must be said that the illustrations throughout were wonderful. These only added to the eagerly described zombies (when they did feature), and the inclusion of the Bennet’s sister’s warrior skills on the  whole, is often so well placed that the further you read, the more subtle and well-blended to Austen’s prose and character determination; these traits and indications of author originality become. Once or twice I even caught myself thinking back- wondering if they had always had these attributes!

A reader expecting large chunks to be utterly changed and chock-a-block of zombie killing sprees will be disappointed. However, a reader with a preference for the classics, but a likeness for delving into the modern or even gruesome; will appreciate the retained structure and essence of this as an adaptation.

By the time I’d reached chapter 35, in which Elizabeth receives Darcy’s explanatory letter, I was well and truly sucked in. It is, as always, at this point that I decided which characters I like and dislike and forth. The adapted version of Darcy’s letter has an element of fun breathed into an otherwise- and still is- very intense moment for Elizabeth. But honestly, the great Mr Darcy mistaking a cold for the plague- really?! Having said that, that is precisely the whole reasoning behind the novel.

The most interesting side character in this take on Pride and Prejudice is timid Charlotte Lucas. An otherwise forgettable character, slowing succumbing to a zombie state of existence, before being beheaded. The depiction and fascination of the human body makes real links to the Nineteenth Century’s horror stories, as Grahame-Smith takes us again and again, through the changes which Charlotte goes through. But luckily does not over do it, as is so easily done. Charlotte is at least allowed to retain some of the dignity with which Austen ascribed to the future Mrs Collins.

Other variations in the plot include a rather different state of marriage for Mr Wickham and Lydia Wickham . The fate in this novel is rather more severe, more deserved and wholly more satisfactory to the reader. In essence, they really do get what is coming to them, and honestly it is the one of my top three most satisfactory conclusions of the entire novel. In addition the minute change to Mary Bennet’s character, upon her elder sisters leaving the family home, is rather amusing and could in fact be a subject for her own novella, should anyone at Quirk Classics have the inclination.

I feel I should also add that there were several sporadic moments of comedy which went beyond Austen. These certainly would not have been accepted by a conservative Victorian audience, but I loved them and laughed with Seth Grahame-Smith as he slyly comments on Mr Darcy’s ‘most English parts’!

This was certainly Austen-esque enough for my liking. Overall Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is a horror, comedic, romantic medley which allows both authors to periodically amuse, shock and entertain. What more could a reader ask for?

© Gemma Feltham January 29 2013

6 Comments

Filed under Jane Austen